Amazon, The iPad, and Why iBooks Might Not Be So Great

Amazon has been proudly showing off their iPad app today, and made it clear they’re looking to develop for tablets as a category. Since there’s really only one category of Apple tablet-esque devices, it’s safe to assume devices like the HP Slate, and possibly, hopefully, Android tablets, will also be blessed with a big-screen and finger friendly version of the Kindle.

Compare this to the iBooks app, which, if it has any portability at all, will most likely only move between the iPhone and the iPad, and possible on macs. If you had to tie your data up in a proprietary store, which would you choose? The one that lets you be platform agnostic, read on eInk, small devices, big devices, tablets, computers, all with near-seamless wireless sync, or the store that ties you deeply to one ecosystem?

Amazon’s potentially brilliant business model is that they are able to have a closed, controlled system and still offer flexibility and choice. This is similar to Kobo, though they offer this on a much smaller scale and don’t have the added benefit of an ebook reader they control into the mix. And this would apply to B&N if all their books synced across all their programs-to the best of my knowledge they do not. This bridges the major problem with ebooks right now; everything is very silo’d and the DRM is not general interoperable. Your content from Amazon lives in one silo, from B&N in another, from iBooks in a third, etc. As a consumer, you really only have a few options: Bet the farm on one DRM plan, hedge your bets with a toe in a few different waters, or buy only DRM-free books.

Betting on one store is risky, and doubly so when your books are locked to both a store and a device. Hedging with several stores is a pain to track, and requires either several devices or one multipurpose device. And while DRM-free offers loads of flexibility, the content is thin. With a strategy that spreads support for the same DRM across multiple devices, you at least gain some modicum of flexibility within one silo. There’s always Adobe’s Digital Editions DRM, arguably the most widely used version. If you’re committing to that system, then Kobo becomes the best option; yes, your data is still stuck in one DRM format, but Kobo gives you the widest flexibility to read your books across multiple platforms (and they have an iPad version ready as well). Similarly, if you value ebook reader-tablet-computer-smartphone sync, your best bet is Amazon. Either way, the idea is to keep your data moving freely between multiple devices across platforms and manufacturers.

Engadget said, in their writeup of the Amazon for Tablets announcement, “So seriously, we ask you, in an age where content is king, are you really going to buy an eReader dedicated to a single store?”

My question, then, is “If content is king, why buy content that’s tied to a single device?” Hopefully Apple agrees, and quickly approves Amazon and Kobo’s apps. We’ll find out soon enough!

Categories: eBooks, Editorials

Tags: , , , , ,

8 replies

  1. They won’t. It will duplicate functions built into the iPad which means, it won’t get approved. Sorry to burst your bubble Carly. Hope I am wrong, but I think that is how it will play out.

  2. Apple is risking alienating many potential buyers if they play the dupe functionality card. There isn’t much upside to it imo. Of course, if they do I will happily lead the pitchfork wielding charge.

  3. Apple let the Bing search app onto the iPhone, despite duplicate functionality. My guess is that the Kindle app is approved.

    Apple wants to sell iPads, not necessarily iBooks. (Well, you know what I mean…)

  4. I think Apple makes these decisions at a fairly high level and then uses the ‘duplicate functionality’ as a sort of excuse to kill stuff.

    They are a hardware (and OS) company, and are interested in selling more hardware first and foremost. I mean, look at music – they may have the huge music store, but they make more profits from iPod sales by far.

    So if allowing the Amazoon and B&N and eReader stores access helps them out, they will allow it. But I anticipate them looking for a way to integrate all of that functionality and then killing off the other apps.

  5. For the record, Joel is wrong. iBooks will be available from the App Store and is not built in to the iPad. I suspect it was implemented this way specifically to allow other eBook apps on the iPad without requiring an exception to their “duplicate functions” rule.

  6. I completely missed out on the part where Shortcovers became Kobo … they probably sent me something … I just missed it!


  1. Allistair Lee
  2. Rich Beynon