The Hidden Price of Our Gadget Obsession: Child Labor

One item that came through in Apple’s Supplier report last week was a marked increase in issues with child labor in supplier facilities, particularly in China. The report noted that Apple ” audited 127 facilities and found 91 cases including 31 workers who had been hired prior to reaching the legal age, but were no longer underage or no longer employed at the time of the audit.”

Before you get out the Apple-bashing hammer, remember that EVERYONE making devices is using these facilities – Dell, Asus, Acer, HP, even Samsung gets loads of stuff from these plants. This means it is a huge and spreading issue as Chinese companies do whatever they can to draw more and more business. Apple is doing what it can, as the report notes:

Apple has required the suppliers to return the young people to their families and support their return to school while continuing to pay them until they reach 16 years of age. Apple said it has also required the suppliers to improve their management, such as labor recruitment practices and age-verification procedures, to prevent recurrences.

It is a shame to see these practices continuing year after year … but it is more disturbing to see it getting worse as our thirst increases for the latest cool tech.

Source: EETimes

Categories: News

Tags: , , , ,

3 replies

  1. RT @geardiarysite: The Hidden Price of Our Gadget Obsession: Child Labor

  2. RT @GearDiarySite: The Hidden Price of Our Gadget Obsession: Child Labor

  3. It’s interesting to me that we bash Apple for these kinds of findings regularly, but where is an equivalent Dell Supplier Report and it’s findings, or an HP Supplier Report or an HTC supplier report?

    As you said, they all use many of the same suppliers with the same issues, but it’s only Apple we hear from and Apple we bash. Same thing happened with the “Green” reports a few years ago – the only one ever mentioned was Apple – what about the others?

    Do we bash them because they are the only ones that report on these things or are they being pressured to report because of their name and reputation? Are we expecting more from them than other manufacturers? Either way – why don’t we hear the same info from the other big tech manufacturers and what steps they are taking to correct these issues?