NRA Demonstrates Either Humor or Looniness with Release of Practice Range App

Gear Diary is reader-supported. When you buy through links posted on our site, we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

You can learn more by clicking here.

NRA Shooting Range

One thing is very clear about video games and violence – there has NEVER been a causal link established between the two. There have been indications that violent media (not just games) desensitizes the impact of other violent media, and that exposure to violent media (again, not just games) causes short-term increased aggression.

But that has never stopped some from trying to blame violence on video games. It was done for Columbine, and ever since you can be sure if a young person commits a shooting rampage there will be an immediate look at the impact of video games. The finger-pointing blame-game played out as expected last month in Connecticut after that school tragedy, as NRA executive vice-president Wayne LaPierre was quoted in this Forbes article:

Guns don’t kill people. Video games, the media and Obama’s budget kill people.

So it is pretty clear – the NRA is very heavily amongst those who believe that shooting weapons in video games leads directly to being a rampage killer. So their next course of action was clear – release a video game featuring shooting! No, really – that is EXACTLY what they did!

Here is part of the description:

TARGET PRACTICE
NRA: Practice Range also offers a 3D shooting game that instills safe and responsible ownership through fun challenges and realistic simulations. It strikes the right balance of gaming and safety education, allowing you to enjoy the most authentic experience possible.

 9 firearms
3 immersive shooting ranges
3 distinct difficult levels
Analog & Gyroscope game controls
Game Center integration

There is other stuff in the app, such as safety and other informational elements, but based on a quick check-out, the app is crap. It is a poorly done simulator that has no reason to exist aside from being an NRA commercial. My son has ‘gun apps’ that depict realistic models of weapons with accurate firing rates, sampled sounds (including falling shells) as well as gobs of factual minutia about the history, use in combat, pros and cons and so on. THAT app provides someone with an interest in guns a way to explore the long history of weapons in a deep and interactive way. NRA Practice Range? Not worth the small download.

Head to the iTunes App Store and check it out if you care!

And let us know what you think!

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!


About the Author

Michael Anderson
I have loved technology for as long as I can remember - and have been a computer gamer since the PDP-10! Mobile Technology has played a major role in my life - I have used an electronic companion since the HP95LX more than 20 years ago, and have been a 'Laptop First' person since my Compaq LTE Lite 3/20 and Powerbook 170 back in 1991! As an avid gamer and gadget-junkie I was constantly asked for my opinions on new technology, which led to writing small blurbs ... and eventually becoming a reviewer many years ago. My family is my biggest priority in life, and they alternate between loving and tolerating my gaming and gadget hobbies ... but ultimately benefits from the addition of technology to our lives!

1 Comment on "NRA Demonstrates Either Humor or Looniness with Release of Practice Range App"

  1. Patrick Cha | January 16, 2013 at 8:50 pm |

    The author seems to equate guns and shooting with violence. A shooting range simulator isn’t a violent game unless it simulates a voilent act, such as shooting people. It’s the same as equating a flight simulator to an air combat game. Both are airplane games, but one is violent and the other is not. NRA fan or not, this article is just unfair. The NRA quote is from a Forbes article that only contains the single quote without any other context. Even if the quote was exactly as the author understood it, the game still isn’t violent. So what’s the issue then?

Comments are closed.