Is Under Armour the Dark Horse to Win in Wearables?

Even before Apple announced their Apple Watch, much of the tech world was looking to wearables to be the next big thing. Everyone is looking to established technology companies, but there’s someone coming in from outside the tech world positioning themselves to dominate, especially with their latest acquisitions: Under Armour

Under Armour

Before we get into my theory on Under Armour, let’s talk about wearables for a second. There are really two main types of wearable technology: the fitness/quantified self kind, and the “I need an extension of my smartphone” kind. There is significant overlap, but I think where Under Armour is targeting is in the quantified self area. Every company wants in on helping people track their health and fitness. Apple has HealthKit, Google has Google Fit, and Microsoft has Microsoft Health. This is an attractive area because the more people get hooked on tracking their fitness, especially with specific hubs that aggregate everything for them, the more likely they are to stick with those platforms. Think of your health as being similar to an app portfolio or your music library; once you’ve amassed a critical amount of data/apps/music, you don’t want to bother to convert and switch it all. Plus all that data about everyone’s health habits is extraordinarily valuable, and allows all sorts of companies and advertisers to best target their audience.

So that brings us to Under Armour. They’re not even a 20-year-old company, yet they’ve already established themselves as a strong competitor in the field of athletic clothing and footwear, ranking behind Nike as the #2 fitness brand in the United States. I’ll admit, I don’t have a ton of UA gear, but I do have an Under Armour baseball hat, and it’s my all-time favorite hat. I wear it for everything from working out to around the house, and it is light years ahead of any Nike hat I’ve had. They are ambitious, they move quickly, and they are currently targeting the quantified fitness world with their acquisition of My Fitness Pal and Endomondo. They already bought the Map My Fitness portfolio last year, so they’ve now aggregated three huge fitness platforms and user bases under one roof. According to CNBC, the combined base tops 131 million registered users. That’s a lot of users, and even if a good portion are people who registered and stopped using the service, there’s still plenty of active users available. And now Under Armour is the owner and gatekeeper of all that data and all those dedicated fitness consumers.

Apple, Google and Microsoft should be sweating right now. Under Armour has said they’re happy to let other hardware tap into their ecosystem, and I know that Map My Fitness offers a great deal of cross-app data sharing already. But if Under Armour’s hub is everyone’s central spot, that leaves Healthkit, Google Fit, and Microsoft Health at a disadvantage. MapMyFitness, Endomondo, and MyFitnessPal are heavyweights in the mobile fitness world already. People like and use those apps, and Under Armour has a strong brand on the clothing side as well. It’s not going to be easy to lure customers away from their established apps, with new money, support, and possibly discounts and other clothing perks behind them from Under Armour. They’re starting already with Under Armour Record, a site to aggregate all your MapMyFitness data (and I am sure My Fitness Pal integration is coming very soon). A cross-platform, multi-app system using existing and popular apps is already a better bet than one from scratch, no matter whose brand is at the top. And if Under Armour ever changes their mind and rolls out a wearable of their own to go with their portfolio, well, Fitbit, Jawbone, Misfit and the others are going to be in serious trouble!

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. If you are shopping on Amazon anyway, buying from our links gives Gear Diary a small commission.

About the Author

Zek has been a gadget fiend for a long time, going back to their first PDA (a Palm M100). They quickly went from researching what PDA to buy to following tech news closely and keeping up with the latest and greatest stuff. They love writing about ebooks because they combine their two favorite activities; reading anything and everything, and talking about fun new tech toys. What could be better?

2 Comments on "Is Under Armour the Dark Horse to Win in Wearables?"

  1. I am not a fan of any of the apps under the Under Armour brand, find them bit to ‘money grabby’ … but I LOVE their running clothes. I own more Under Armour stuff than any other gear – and It works for me from 90F runs all the way to the -15F (not counting wind) I ran in this morning.

    So I am already disposed to go with their stuff. And totally agree with what you say.

    I think 2015 is going to be an amazing (and incredibly competitive) year for wearables.

    • I think MapMyFitness can be a bit money grabby with their constant pitches to upgrade, but MyFitnessPal is 100% free. And if they replaced all the ads with Under Armour ads I’m ok with that. 🙂

      UA makes some amazing products. And between their reputation as a quality gear maker and the individual app reputations and user bases, it wouldn’t take much to combine them into a very powerful ecosystem.

      I agree about wearables this year-I think prices will drop and the features will improve…but I think the real demand is going to be for fitness trackers, not smartwatches.

Comments are closed.