Another Way iPhone Beats Android – Battery Life in the Dungeon!

Another Way iPhone Beats Android - Battery Life in the Dungeon!

Another Way iPhone Beats Android – Battery Life in the Dungeon!

We all know that it is an Apple & Samsung world – and pretty much everywhere I go I carry both my Apple iPhone 5 and Samsung Galaxy S3. They are both excellent phones, and I highly recommend both of them to anyone looking for a phone – each has strengths and weaknesses, just like any other device. Don’t believe the hype whenever someone tells you one is ‘far superior’ to the other: it simply meets their personal needs better. Recently my work has required me to be at a remote manufacturing facility where there is no cell phone signal but there is WiFi. I set up both phones to use WiFi and by the end of the day I found another way iPhone beats Android – battery life in the dungeon!

Most older tech lovers remember before businesses had repeaters and amplifiers to deal with the massive signal degradation caused by concrete and steel – I remember having to shut off phones before entering our wafer fab building otherwise the phone would be hot and dead in a few hours. That same ‘signal hunting’ goes on now even with smartphones, and if you are in a no-signal zone for too long your phone will end up running through the battery. That is simply because phones REALLY want a signal lock and will desperately expend power trying to find and lock on a signal.

But more recently smartphones have allowed users to link up to WiFi networks. This allows for faster data transfer (in some cases), and it doesn’t use up your precious data allocation. Most smartphone users spend upwards of 90% of their time ion WiFi coverage, and smartphone makers have increasingly allowed functionality over WiFi that was previously reserved for cell data – in particular messaging.

But the question it – how should a smartphone manage power in an area of abundant WiFi but no cell coverage?

Turns out that iOS and Android have different answers! During my very first trip I discovered that while the iPhone battery lasts all day long, the Galaxy S3 will generally be totally dead by lunch – and these phones would normally have more or less equal battery life! My iPhone is my primary device, meaning I am using it all day long; the Galaxy S3 will sometimes sit in my bag most of the day.

To test it further I set up an experiment: since I have the same email accounts, Twitter, Facebook and so on installed on both devices, it was easy to partition what I looked at and where. What I did was only let myself check my phone every 30 minutes (unless a text came in), and alternated email and social media and RSS between the phones. I did this every day for a week (5 days).

The results?
– By lunch time (I had been at the plant ~4-5 hours) each day the iPhone still have >80% battery, whereas the Galaxy S3 had <10%.
– By the end of the day (we are doing ~12-13 hour days) the iPhone had >50% and the Galaxy S3 was long since dead.
– The last two days I plugged the Galaxy S3 into the PowerStick+ just after lunch to keep it on life support … and on both days by the time I left the PowerStick+ was nearly drained and the Galaxy S3 had ~20-25% battery remaining.

So there it is – Apple has figured out a way to keep your battery alive when you are totally out of cell signal range … and Samsung just keeps draining the battery in hopes that cell signal will come along and save it. This is not a normal use case, far from it – most people are around at least decent cell signal a lot of the time. But if you know you will be in a dead zone, this is one more bit of data to help you decide what phone is right for you.

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. If you are shopping on Amazon anyway, buying from our links gives Gear Diary a small commission.

About the Author

Michael Anderson
I have loved technology for as long as I can remember - and have been a computer gamer since the PDP-10! Mobile Technology has played a major role in my life - I have used an electronic companion since the HP95LX more than 20 years ago, and have been a 'Laptop First' person since my Compaq LTE Lite 3/20 and Powerbook 170 back in 1991! As an avid gamer and gadget-junkie I was constantly asked for my opinions on new technology, which led to writing small blurbs ... and eventually becoming a reviewer many years ago. My family is my biggest priority in life, and they alternate between loving and tolerating my gaming and gadget hobbies ... but ultimately benefits from the addition of technology to our lives!

5 Comments on "Another Way iPhone Beats Android – Battery Life in the Dungeon!"

  1. Doug Miller | March 22, 2013 at 7:54 am |

    Michael, were these both Verizon phones, or different carriers?

    I know that both of my VZW Android phones have had horrible battery life in poor cell areas. I put the phone in airplane mode (with WiFi on) when I know that I’ll be in such an area for an extended period (in fact, it’s one reason why I decided to get a network extender at home.) It’s good to know that an iPhone does not have that problem (if both your phones were VZW) – that may be a deciding factor on my next upgrade!

  2. Forgive my being the “Master of the completely obvious” for a moment but… The very fact we are having this discussion in 2013 is so very frustrating. I really wish carriers and hardware manufacturers would put network speed and hardware bells and whistles on hold for a year or two and focus ONLY on increasing battery life and performance. “Range anxiety” is one factor keeping me from an electric car and “battery life anxiety” for which I have little patience these days. The fact that you need to turn off cell reception in various places to get through the day Doug is absurd!!!

  3. Doug Miller | March 22, 2013 at 9:08 am |

    It is one reason why I was asking if both phones are Verizon. I believe that CDMA networks are harder on phones with weaker signals than GSM phones, so this could be an issue of GSM vs. CDMA, rather than iOS vs. Android, or Apple vs. Samsung (though my two VZW Android phones have been HTC and Motorola phones.)

    The good news is that I can count on one hand the number of times that I have had to use Airplane mode this way – it’s been particularly problematic at a ski cabin in Maine I have visited, which gets no signal.

    Anyway, adding to your request for better battery life technology rather than putting network speed upgrades on hold is that this would not be a problem if the carriers had extended coverage to everywhere there is a home and business in their service area rather than deciding to roll out LTE coverage to existing locations. I understand the reason – the population in Maine where this problem occurs is very, very low and rather seasonal – but it remains frustrating.

  4. Doug – they are different carriers. That is why I am always wary of comparing signal in normal usage, because pretty much everywhere I go I have excellent VZW coverage. It was only because there was *no* cell coverage that I considered the comparison.

    Given that most phones have multi-antenna modules at this point I think that the behavior of a device in a no-signal situation should be more related to the hardware/OS logic cycle than something carrier related.

    We already know that Apple had to really push WiFi functionality due to issues with AT&T and network clogging/usage back in the early days.

    But I think that the triangulation of data I have tells you the answer:

    – iPhone (VZW) in no signal situation – easily lasts all day.
    – Galaxy S3 (US Cellular) in no signal situation – dead after lunch.
    – Moto Droid Razor Maxx (VZW) in no signal situation – dead by end of day.

  5. Doug Miller | March 22, 2013 at 9:59 am |

    Great, thanks. All are CDMA for voice signal, so that’s perfect.

Comments are closed.